Carl absolutely refused any job
where he and Gerty could not work together. They were met with some resistance,
but soon everyone knew of Gerty’s competence as a biochemist. Despite working
together, Gerty was still paid a much lower wage than her husband. But they
still continued on with their work. It was Gerty who had the main ideas, and her husband supported her through and through. Together, they will eventually publish fifty papers in a
span of nine years. During the 1920s, it was understood that sugar is used as
energy for the body and that insulin helped regulate sugar levels in diabetics.
However, the exact process was unknown. Gerty’s own father had died from
diabetes, and this is what influenced her to focus on sugar metabolism.
Through
tireless research, the Coris figured out how humans processed sugar for energy.
They discovered this process in 1929, and named it the Cori cycle. How it works
is that glucose in the liver is transported to the muscles. Once the glucose is
used for its energy, it turns into lactic acid. The lactic acid is then
processed in the liver and turned into glycogen. The glycogen is broken down
into glucose, and the cycle starts over. The enzyme that transforms glycogen
into glucose was discovered to be phosphorylase. Together, the Coris also
managed to make glycogen in a test tube. This was the first time such a large,
complicated molecule was created in a tube. For their efforts, they were
awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1947. Their discovery
helped further research concerning diabetes. The Coris’ lab eventually
Although they co-discovered the Cori
cycle, it was Carl who received countless job offers. However, he ended up
turning down most of them because they wouldn’t allow Gerty to work with him.
Soon, Gerty would develop a bone marrow disease that severely weakened
her. She absolutely refused to quit her
research. Carl would even carry her around her lab when she could no longer
walk. She continued to work in her lab until the day she died in 1957. Gerty’s
and Carl’s story shows how much we need to support our lady scientists out
there. Even today, women only take up about a quarter of the STEM work force.
Thankfully, the number of women studying science is on the rise. The important
thing is to support women in their research and to encourage little girls that
they truly can be whoever they want to be when they grow up. Who knows, maybe
one day one of those little girls will make a discovery that will shock the
world down to its core.
“Women in Science: 50 Fearless Pioneers Who Changed the World,” written and Illustrated by Rachel Ignotofsky
Gerty
Cori- Facts: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1947/cori-gt-facts.html
Dr.
Gerty Theresa Radnitz Cori: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/changingthefaceofmedicine/physicians/biography_69.html
Carl
and Gerty Cori and Carbohydrate Metabolism: https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/carbohydratemetabolism.html
This is so cute. I don't much believable in "true love", but if it's real, this is it. I very much agree with what you said about encouraging little girls. One of the few reasons I want kids is so I can do kiddy science experiments with them and hopefully make them as interested in science as I am.
ReplyDeleteAnother great woman in science! This story is really beautiful, but also sad to think of the hardships a woman scientist had to go through. I am grateful that we are supported by many to pursue our scientific inquiries. While there are still glass ceilings that need to be broken regarding women in STEM, I am optimistic that the future is bright for each new generation of young girls.
ReplyDeleteGo girl power! I love that so many women are getting involved in science now. We can even see it here at Sam, there seem to be just as many women science majors and professors as men. It's also a good example of how men and women really can do good science together in peace, which is what it's all about. A lot of science is a team effort, and once we overcome many of the obstacles still in place attached to women in science then we can have some of the best teams based on merit instead of gender.
ReplyDeleteThe historic exclusion of women in science is a tragedy. Imagine where we would be know, what we would understand, if science hadn't been the sole province of entitled, white* men for centuries. And not to be a downer, but the bullshit isn't over. Women still face discrimination, not so much in obtaining degrees**, but in obtaining and keeping tenure track jobs. I think it's safe to say that a woman with the same credentials as a man in a STEM field is likely both more talented and hard-working.
ReplyDelete*I'm including this even though it hasn't really been part of the conversation.
**Take that back...women face hurdles in dealing with systemic sexual harassment and discrimination, that men just don't. If you aren't really in the mood to be angry, don't read this.